Palau vs South Africa: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Palau
- South Africa
How they compare
Palau currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Palau ranks 88th and South Africa ranks 88th of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Palau or South Africa?
- Palau, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Palau and South Africa?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Palau and South Africa rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Palau ranks 88th and South Africa ranks 88th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.