Rwanda vs Sweden: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Rwanda ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.