Antigua and Barbuda vs Brunei Darussalam: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
50
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam
50
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
123rd
Brunei Darussalam rank
123rd
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 50 against 50 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.33 | 41.67 | 16.67 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Brunei Darussalam?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 50 against 50 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.