Australia vs Azerbaijan: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Australia
75
in 2019
Azerbaijan
75
in 2019
Australia rank
25th
Azerbaijan rank
25th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Australia
  • Azerbaijan
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Australia currently reports 75 against 75 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 25th and Azerbaijan ranks 25th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Azerbaijan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Azerbaijan Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 61.11 5.56 Australia
2010s 69.17 82.5 13.33 Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Australia or Azerbaijan?
Australia, at 75 against 75 in Azerbaijan as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Australia and Azerbaijan?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Azerbaijan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Australia and Azerbaijan rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Australia ranks 25th and Azerbaijan ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.