Bangladesh vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Bangladesh
41.67
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
41.67
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
150th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
150th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 41.67 against 41.67 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of Congo has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 150th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 150th of 191 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.67 | 50 | 8.33 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 41.67 | 47.5 | 5.83 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Bangladesh or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Bangladesh, at 41.67 against 41.67 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Bangladesh and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 150th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 150th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.