Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Bangladesh
41.67
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
41.67
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
149th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
149th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 41.67 against 41.67 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 149th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 149th of 190 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.67 | 33.33 | 8.33 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 41.67 | 40.83 | 0.8333 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Bangladesh or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Bangladesh, at 41.67 against 41.67 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 149th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 149th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.