Belgium vs Congo, Dem. Rep.: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Belgium
41.67
in 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep.
41.67
in 2019
Belgium rank
147th
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
147th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
01020304050200420112019

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 41.67 against 41.67 in Congo, Dem. Rep., a difference of 0.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Congo, Dem. Rep. has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 147th and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 147th of 188 countries.

Congo, Dem. Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Congo, Dem. Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 50 50 0
2010s 41.67 47.5 5.83 Congo, Dem. Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Belgium or Congo, Dem. Rep.?
Belgium, at 41.67 against 41.67 in Congo, Dem. Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Belgium and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Belgium and Congo, Dem. Rep. rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Belgium ranks 147th and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 147th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.