Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs South Africa: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
50
in 2019
South Africa
50
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
123rd
South Africa rank
123rd
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- South Africa
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 50 against 50 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 123rd and South Africa ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or South Africa?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 50 against 50 in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and South Africa?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and South Africa?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and South Africa rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 123rd and South Africa ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.