Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
50
in 2019
North Macedonia
50
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
123rd
North Macedonia rank
123rd
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 50 against 50 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 43.06 | 6.94 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or North Macedonia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 50 against 50 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.