Burundi vs Central African Republic: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Burundi
66.67
in 2019
Central African Republic
66.67
in 2019
Burundi rank
51st
Central African Republic rank
51st
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Burundi
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 51st and Central African Republic ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.67 | 66.67 | 25 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 59.17 | 66.67 | 7.5 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Burundi or Central African Republic?
- Burundi, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Burundi and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Central African Republic?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Burundi and Central African Republic rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Burundi ranks 51st and Central African Republic ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.