Central African Republic vs Côte d'Ivoire: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Central African Republic
66.67
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire
66.67
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
51st
Côte d'Ivoire rank
51st
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 51st and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 55.56 | 11.11 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 60 | 6.67 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Central African Republic or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Central African Republic, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Central African Republic and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 51st and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.