Central African Republic vs Hong Kong, China: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Central African Republic
66.67
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
66.67
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
51st
Hong Kong, China rank
51st
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 51st and Hong Kong, China ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Central African Republic or Hong Kong, China?
- Central African Republic, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Central African Republic and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Hong Kong, China?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Hong Kong, China rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 51st and Hong Kong, China ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.