China vs Latvia: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
China
78.75
in 2019
Latvia
75
in 2019
China rank
24th
Latvia rank
25th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 78.75 against 75 in Latvia, a difference of 3.75.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was China ahead.
China ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 40.28 | 26.39 | China |
| 2010s | 69.08 | 70 | 0.9167 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, China or Latvia?
- China, at 78.75 against 75 in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between China and Latvia?
- 3.75, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- China ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 25th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.