China vs Seychelles: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

China
78.75
in 2019
Seychelles
75
in 2019
China rank
24th
Seychelles rank
25th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • China
  • Seychelles
020406080200420112019

How they compare

China currently reports 78.75 against 75 in Seychelles, a difference of 3.75.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.

China ranks 24th and Seychelles ranks 25th of 188 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 75 8.33 Seychelles
2010s 69.08 75 5.92 Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, China or Seychelles?
China, at 78.75 against 75 in Seychelles as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between China and Seychelles?
3.75, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Seychelles?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do China and Seychelles rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
China ranks 24th and Seychelles ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.