Comoros vs Russian Federation: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Comoros
75
in 2019
Russian Federation
75
in 2019
Comoros rank
25th
Russian Federation rank
25th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Russian Federation
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 75 against 75 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 25th and Russian Federation ranks 25th of 188 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 75 50 25 Comoros
2010s 75 68.33 6.67 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Comoros or Russian Federation?
Comoros, at 75 against 75 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Comoros and Russian Federation?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Russian Federation?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Russian Federation rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Comoros ranks 25th and Russian Federation ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.