Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Ecuador: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Congo, Dem. Rep.
41.67
in 2019
Ecuador
41.67
in 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
147th
Ecuador rank
147th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
  • Ecuador
01020304050200420112019

How they compare

Congo, Dem. Rep. currently reports 41.67 against 41.67 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.

Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 147th and Ecuador ranks 147th of 188 countries.

Congo, Dem. Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Dem. Rep. Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 50 47.22 2.78 Congo, Dem. Rep.
2010s 47.5 47.5 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Ecuador?
Congo, Dem. Rep., at 41.67 against 41.67 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Ecuador?
0, with Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Ecuador?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Ecuador rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 147th and Ecuador ranks 147th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.