Democratic Republic of Congo vs Grenada: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
41.67
in 2019
Grenada
41.67
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
150th
Grenada rank
150th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Grenada
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 41.67 against 41.67 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 150th and Grenada ranks 150th of 191 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 41.67 | 8.33 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 47.5 | 41.67 | 5.83 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Grenada?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 41.67 against 41.67 in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Grenada?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Grenada?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Grenada rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 150th and Grenada ranks 150th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.