Côte d'Ivoire vs Hong Kong, China: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Côte d'Ivoire
66.67
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
66.67
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
51st
Hong Kong, China rank
51st
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 51st and Hong Kong, China ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.56 | 66.67 | 11.11 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 60 | 66.67 | 6.67 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Hong Kong, China?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Hong Kong, China?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Hong Kong, China rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 51st and Hong Kong, China ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.