Dominican Republic vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Dominican Republic
58.33
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
58.33
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
80th
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
80th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 58.33 against 58.33 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 80th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 80th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.33 | 58.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 58.33 | 58.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Dominican Republic or Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- Dominican Republic, at 58.33 against 58.33 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Dominican Republic and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 80th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 80th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.