El Salvador vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
El Salvador
58.33
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
58.33
in 2019
El Salvador rank
80th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
80th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 58.33 against 58.33 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 80th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 80th of 190 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.94 | 50 | 6.94 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 58.33 | 54.17 | 4.17 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, El Salvador or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- El Salvador, at 58.33 against 58.33 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between El Salvador and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 80th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 80th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.