Eritrea vs Micronesia, Fed. Sts.: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Eritrea
16.67
in 2019
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
0
in 2019
Eritrea rank
181st
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank
184th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Eritrea
  • Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
051015200420112019

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 16.67 against 0 in Micronesia, Fed. Sts., a difference of 16.67.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 181st and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 184th of 188 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Micronesia, Fed. Sts. Difference Ahead
2000s 16.67 0 16.67 Eritrea
2010s 16.67 0 16.67 Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Eritrea or Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
Eritrea, at 16.67 against 0 in Micronesia, Fed. Sts. as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Eritrea and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
16.67, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Eritrea and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Eritrea ranks 181st and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 184th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.