Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of vs South Sudan, Republic of: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
50
in 2019
South Sudan, Republic of
50
in 2019
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank
122nd
South Sudan, Republic of rank
122nd
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
- South Sudan, Republic of
How they compare
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of currently reports 50 against 50 in South Sudan, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 122nd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of or South Sudan, Republic of?
- Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of, at 50 against 50 in South Sudan, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 0, with Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and South Sudan, Republic of rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 122nd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.