Gambia, The vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Gambia, The
58.33
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
58.33
in 2019
Gambia, The rank
80th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
80th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Gambia, The
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Gambia, The currently reports 58.33 against 58.33 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gambia, The ahead.
Gambia, The ranks 80th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 80th of 190 countries.
Gambia, The has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia, The | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.33 | 50 | 8.33 | Gambia, The |
| 2010s | 58.33 | 54.17 | 4.17 | Gambia, The |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Gambia, The or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Gambia, The, at 58.33 against 58.33 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Gambia, The and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Gambia, The ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia, The and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Gambia, The and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Gambia, The ranks 80th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 80th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.