Guinea vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Guinea
58.33
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
58.33
in 2019
Guinea rank
80th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
80th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guinea
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
0204060200420112019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 58.33 against 58.33 in Iran, Islamic Rep., a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 80th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 80th of 188 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 58.33 50 8.33 Guinea
2010s 58.33 54.17 4.17 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Guinea or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Guinea, at 58.33 against 58.33 in Iran, Islamic Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Guinea and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Guinea and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Guinea ranks 80th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 80th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.