Hong Kong, China vs Republic of Moldova: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Hong Kong, China
66.67
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
66.67
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
51st
Republic of Moldova rank
51st
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Republic of Moldova ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 59.72 | 6.94 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Hong Kong, China or Republic of Moldova?
- Hong Kong, China, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Hong Kong, China and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Republic of Moldova?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Republic of Moldova rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Republic of Moldova ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.