Iran, Islamic Rep. vs Malawi: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Iran, Islamic Rep.
58.33
in 2019
Malawi
58.33
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
80th
Malawi rank
80th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
  • Malawi
0204060200420112019

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Rep. currently reports 58.33 against 58.33 in Malawi, a difference of 0.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 80th and Malawi ranks 80th of 188 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Rep. Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 50 58.33 8.33 Malawi
2010s 54.17 58.33 4.17 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Iran, Islamic Rep. or Malawi?
Iran, Islamic Rep., at 58.33 against 58.33 in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Iran, Islamic Rep. and Malawi?
0, with Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Rep. and Malawi?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Iran, Islamic Rep. and Malawi rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 80th and Malawi ranks 80th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.