South Korea vs North Macedonia: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

South Korea
50
in 2019
North Macedonia
50
in 2019
South Korea rank
120th
North Macedonia rank
120th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • North Macedonia
01020304050200420112019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 50 against 50 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 120th and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 188 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 50 43.06 6.94 South Korea
2010s 50 50 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, South Korea or North Macedonia?
South Korea, at 50 against 50 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between South Korea and North Macedonia?
0, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and North Macedonia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do South Korea and North Macedonia rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
South Korea ranks 120th and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.