Mauritius vs United States: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Mauritius
66.67
in 2019
United States
71.67
in 2019
Mauritius rank
51st
United States rank
50th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • United States
020406080200420112019

How they compare

United States currently reports 71.67 against 66.67 in Mauritius, a difference of 5.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was United States ahead.

Mauritius ranks 51st and United States ranks 50th of 188 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius United States Difference Ahead
2000s 63.89 75 11.11 United States
2010s 72.5 72.67 0.1667 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Mauritius or United States?
United States, at 71.67 against 66.67 in Mauritius as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Mauritius and United States?
5, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United States?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and United States rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Mauritius ranks 51st and United States ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.