Pakistan vs Philippines: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Pakistan
39.17
in 2019
Philippines
33.33
in 2019
Pakistan rank
162nd
Philippines rank
163rd

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
010203040200420112019

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 39.17 against 33.33 in Philippines, a difference of 5.84.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Philippines ahead.

Pakistan ranks 162nd and Philippines ranks 163rd of 188 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 33.33 0
2010s 34.21 33.33 0.875 Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Pakistan or Philippines?
Pakistan, at 39.17 against 33.33 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Pakistan and Philippines?
5.84, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Philippines?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Pakistan and Philippines rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Pakistan ranks 162nd and Philippines ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.