Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Philippines
33.33
in 2019
Uzbekistan
33.33
in 2019
Philippines rank
163rd
Uzbekistan rank
163rd

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Philippines
  • Uzbekistan
101520253035200420112019

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 163rd and Uzbekistan ranks 163rd of 188 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 8.33 25 Philippines
2010s 33.33 20.83 12.5 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Philippines or Uzbekistan?
Philippines, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Philippines and Uzbekistan?
0, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Uzbekistan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Philippines and Uzbekistan rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Philippines ranks 163rd and Uzbekistan ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.