Saudi Arabia vs United Arab Emirates: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Saudi Arabia
91.67
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
91.67
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
6th
United Arab Emirates rank
6th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 91.67 against 91.67 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 6th and United Arab Emirates ranks 6th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 91.67 | 25 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 77.5 | 91.67 | 14.17 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Saudi Arabia or United Arab Emirates?
- Saudi Arabia, at 91.67 against 91.67 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 6th and United Arab Emirates ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.