Slovak Republic vs Taiwan Province of China: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Slovak Republic
83.33
in 2019
Taiwan Province of China
83.33
in 2019
Slovak Republic rank
10th
Taiwan Province of China rank
10th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Slovak Republic
- Taiwan Province of China
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Taiwan Province of China, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Taiwan Province of China has been ahead every year.
Slovak Republic ranks 10th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 10th of 190 countries.
Taiwan Province of China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | Taiwan Province of China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.56 | 83.33 | 2.78 | Taiwan Province of China |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Slovak Republic or Taiwan Province of China?
- Slovak Republic, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Taiwan Province of China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Slovak Republic and Taiwan Province of China?
- 0, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and Taiwan Province of China?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Slovak Republic and Taiwan Province of China rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Slovak Republic ranks 10th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 10th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.