Solomon Islands vs Uganda: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score

Solomon Islands
25
in 2019
Uganda
25
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
175th
Uganda rank
175th

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Uganda
0510152025200420112019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 25 against 25 in Uganda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 175th and Uganda ranks 175th of 188 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 25 16.67 8.33 Solomon Islands
2010s 25 22.5 2.5 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Solomon Islands or Uganda?
Solomon Islands, at 25 against 25 in Uganda as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Solomon Islands and Uganda?
0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Uganda?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Solomon Islands and Uganda rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Solomon Islands ranks 175th and Uganda ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.