Thailand vs United States of America: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Thailand
66.67
in 2019
United States of America
71.67
in 2019
Thailand rank
51st
United States of America rank
50th
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Thailand
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 71.67 against 66.67 in Thailand, a difference of 5.
That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Thailand ranks 51st and United States of America ranks 50th of 190 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 75 | 8.33 | United States of America |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 72.67 | 6 | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: procedures (number) - score, Thailand or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 71.67 against 66.67 in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: procedures (number) - score between Thailand and United States of America?
- 5, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and United States of America?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Thailand and United States of America rank globally for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
- Thailand ranks 51st and United States of America ranks 50th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.