Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Registering property: Procedures

Equatorial Guinea
6 number
in 2019
Serbia
6 number
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
66th
Serbia rank
66th

Registering property: Procedures over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
0246200420112019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 6 number against 6 number in Serbia, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 66th and Serbia ranks 66th of 184 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 6 number 6 number 0 number
2010s 6 number 6 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: procedures, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 6 number against 6 number in Serbia as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: procedures between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0 number, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for registering property: procedures?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 66th and Serbia ranks 66th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 2,876 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The time captures the median duration that property lawyers, notaries or registry officials indicate is necessary to complete a procedure. It is calculated in calendar days. The time estimates of all procedures are added to calculate the total time required to obtain transfer the property title, taking into account simultaneity of processes. It is assumed that the minimum time required for each procedure is one day, except for proce­dures that can be fully completed online, for which the time required is recorded as half a day.