Ethiopia vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Ethiopia
18.33
in 2019
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
18.33
in 2019
Ethiopia rank
166th
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
166th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Ethiopia
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 18.33 against 18.33 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 166th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 166th of 191 countries.
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Ethiopia or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- Ethiopia, at 18.33 against 18.33 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Ethiopia and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 0, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Ethiopia ranks 166th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 166th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the quality of land administration index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.