Guyana vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Guyana
25
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
25
in 2019
Guyana rank
145th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
145th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Guyana
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 25 against 25 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 145th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Guyana or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Guyana, at 25 against 25 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Guyana and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Guyana ranks 145th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the quality of land administration index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.