Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Uganda: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
35
in 2019
Uganda
35
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
118th
Uganda rank
118th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Uganda
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 35 against 35 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th and Uganda ranks 118th of 191 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Uganda?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 35 against 35 in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Uganda?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Uganda rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th and Uganda ranks 118th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the quality of land administration index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.