Bhutan vs San Marino: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Bhutan
23 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino
23 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Bhutan rank
33rd
San Marino rank
33rd
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Bhutan
- San Marino
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 23 DB17-20 methodology against 23 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 33rd and San Marino ranks 33rd of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Bhutan or San Marino?
- Bhutan, at 23 DB17-20 methodology against 23 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Bhutan and San Marino?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and San Marino rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Bhutan ranks 33rd and San Marino ranks 33rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.