Botswana vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Botswana
10.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
10.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Botswana rank
118th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
118th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Botswana
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 10.5 DB17-20 methodology against 10.5 DB17-20 methodology in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 118th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Botswana or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Botswana, at 10.5 DB17-20 methodology against 10.5 DB17-20 methodology in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Botswana and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Botswana ranks 118th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.