Brazil vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Brazil
16.3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
16 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Brazil rank
83rd
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
85th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Brazil
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 16.3 DB17-20 methodology against 16 DB17-20 methodology in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.3 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Brazil ranks 83rd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 85th of 187 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Brazil or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Brazil, at 16.3 DB17-20 methodology against 16 DB17-20 methodology in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.3 DB17-20 methodology, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Brazil ranks 83rd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 85th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.