China vs Croatia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
China
23.95 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Croatia
23.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
28th
Croatia rank
29th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- China
- Croatia
How they compare
China currently reports 23.95 DB17-20 methodology against 23.5 DB17-20 methodology in Croatia, a difference of 0.45 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Croatia ahead.
China ranks 28th and Croatia ranks 29th of 187 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), China or Croatia?
- China, at 23.95 DB17-20 methodology against 23.5 DB17-20 methodology in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between China and Croatia?
- 0.45 DB17-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Croatia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Croatia rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- China ranks 28th and Croatia ranks 29th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.