Democratic Republic of Congo vs Gambia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index … 0-30
Democratic Republic of Congo
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Gambia
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
132nd
Gambia rank
130th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index … 0-30 over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd and Gambia ranks 130th of 187 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Democratic Republic of Congo or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Gambia?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Gambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Gambia rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd and Gambia ranks 130th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.