Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Kiribati: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Kiribati
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
132nd
Kiribati rank
132nd
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Kiribati
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Kiribati, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 132nd and Kiribati ranks 132nd of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Kiribati?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Kiribati?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Kiribati?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Kiribati rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 132nd and Kiribati ranks 132nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.