Czechia vs Japan: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Czechia
25 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan
25.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Czechia rank
23rd
Japan rank
20th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Czechia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 25.5 DB17-20 methodology against 25 DB17-20 methodology in Czechia, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 23rd and Japan ranks 20th of 187 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Czechia or Japan?
- Japan, at 25.5 DB17-20 methodology against 25 DB17-20 methodology in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Czechia and Japan?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Japan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Japan rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Czechia ranks 23rd and Japan ranks 20th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.