Czechia vs Kyrgyzstan: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Czechia
25 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
24 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Czechia rank
23rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
26th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Czechia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 25 DB17-20 methodology against 24 DB17-20 methodology in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th of 187 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Czechia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Czechia, at 25 DB17-20 methodology against 24 DB17-20 methodology in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Czechia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1 DB17-20 methodology, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Czechia ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.