Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Estonia
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Estonia rank
6th
Hong Kong, China rank
6th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Estonia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 27.5 DB17-20 methodology against 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 6th of 187 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Estonia or Hong Kong, China?
- Estonia, at 27.5 DB17-20 methodology against 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Estonia ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 6th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.