Eswatini vs United Arab Emirates: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Eswatini
20.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
21 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Eswatini rank
53rd
United Arab Emirates rank
51st
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Eswatini
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 21 DB17-20 methodology against 20.5 DB17-20 methodology in Eswatini, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 53rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 51st of 187 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Eswatini or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 21 DB17-20 methodology against 20.5 DB17-20 methodology in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Eswatini and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and United Arab Emirates?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and United Arab Emirates rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Eswatini ranks 53rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 51st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.