Gabon vs Sao Tome and Principe: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Gabon
5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Gabon rank
173rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
175th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Gabon
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Gabon ranks 173rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 175th of 187 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Gabon or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Gabon, at 5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Gabon ranks 173rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 175th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.