Grenada vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Grenada
7 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
7 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada rank
152nd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
152nd
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Grenada
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 7 DB17-20 methodology against 7 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 152nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 152nd of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Grenada or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Grenada, at 7 DB17-20 methodology against 7 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Grenada ranks 152nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 152nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.